• Fundraiser for The Louisville Cardinal raises $3,000 to help support student journalism

    Fundraiser for The Louisville Cardinal raises $3,000 to help support student journalism

    The fundraiser for The Louisville Cardinal has ended, and we’re pleased to announce the grand total: $3,000. The funds will be used to help support the publication’s operations and will hopefully make life a little easier for its hard working student journalists.

    A big round of applause goes out to everyone who donated during the campaign. Thank you so much for helping support student journalism and all the important work it accomplishes. Bravo!

    In recognition of everyone who gave $25 or more, we’ve listed their names on our Facebook page and on this pdf. They’re also listed below:

    Platinum ($100 or more):
    Josh Abner
    Mary Z. Ashlock
    Kevin Baker
    Caroline Daniels
    Paul Fultz
    Thomas P. Fultz
    John Harrell
    Joy Hart
    Jim Hines
    Holly Hinson
    John Justus
    Ivan D. Mayes
    Annie Moore
    Tom Pace
    Amy Porco
    Vinny Porco
    Jennifer Recktenwald
    George Taylor Jr.
    Janice Theriot

    Gold ($50 – $99):
    Stephanie Carr
    Michael Cunningham
    Sarah Fultz
    Joseph Garcia
    Donna Hedgespeth
    Frank Porco
    Harry Sanders
    Timothy R. Sanford
    Aryen Schofield Wantland
    Dominic D. Wasserzug
    Sam Wingate

    Silver: ($25 – $49)
    Anastasia Austen
    Jackie Hollenkamp Bentley
    Laura Brock
    Gregory Harris
    Tom Owen
    Connor Price
    Richard Slawsky

    Special thanks to the UofL Department of Communication and the UofL Alumni office, both of whom were instrumental in helping get the fund raiser off the ground, clearing logistical hurdles and keeping track of donations.

    While The Cardinal could always use more financial support, this is a great start. It also demonstrates that there’s a strong and active group of alumni who are willing to help the publication in any way possible. The Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group will remain active going forward, to help The Cardinal when needed, to chronicle and celebrate the publication’s long history, and as a social club for its alumni.

  • The Louisville Cardinal Celebrates Milestone With 100th Anniversary Event

    The Louisville Cardinal Celebrates Milestone With 100th Anniversary Event

    By Paul Fultz

    A standing room only crowd celebrated The Louisville Cardinal’s 100th anniversary as current and former staffers gathered for an emotionally-charged evening at the University of Louisville on Oct. 23.

    About 150 alumni, students, faculty and guests packed into a room in the Student Activities Center to support student journalism and commemorate a milestone for UofL’s independent student news publication.

    “I am so profoundly honored to be with you here tonight, especially our newspaper alumni and current staff,” said current Cardinal Editor-in-Chief Vinny Porco. “To have the privilege of standing up here and using words like we and us when talking about 100 years of student journalism means more to me than you will ever know.

    Together we are a testament to the power of that work. It is a worthy pursuit. We are a distinguished group of people. We are the best and sometimes only proof of student life going back a century at UofL. We are unbiased, we are unbossed. We are The Louisville Cardinal.”

    Porco said he was pleasantly surprised by the large crowd.

    “This is just an absolutely incredible showing,” he said. “We were talking about 50 people, and I’m so touched by your presence. Give yourselves a pat on the back.”

    But the anniversary wasn’t the evening’s only milestone. The second was the newspaper’s first print issue six years after becoming online only at louisvillecardinal.com. Copies of the special anniversary issue were distributed at the event.

    “We talked about how we could make this centennial special,” Porco said. “Among suggestions was a brief return to print, the medium that started it all. Six months later we have something to place in your hands for the very first time since 2020.”

    Porco’s remarks were followed by a three-person panel of former Cardinal staffers from different eras: Deborah Yetter (1974-1977), Jim Hines (1986-90) and Tate Luckey (2020-2024). They fielded questions about the differences between newsrooms then and now, the newspaper’s relationship with university administrators and the challenges of producing an independent student publication.

    “The Cardinal taught us the mechanics of how to report, write and edit on deadline,” Yetter said. “And it taught you how to get along with people. It was the beginning of a lifetime of knowing how much fun it is to work at a newspaper. The give and take, the laughter, the sense of humor. Journalists are some of the funniest people I’ve ever met. And it just kept me going through a lifetime of journalism. I left in 2022 after 40 years at The Courier-Journal.”

    Kandi Walker, chair of UofL’s Department of Communication, brought the evening to a close with a reminder that good journalism doesn’t come free.

    She encouraged those who could to contribute to The Cardinal’s fundraising campaign, helping ensure that the newspaper will continue to serve future generations of students. The campaign runs through Nov. 2, and donations can be made by going to Give.Louisville.Edu/TheCardinal or using the QR code.

    The night gave alumni a chance to reconnect with old friends, share a few memories and reflect on The Cardinal’s long history.

    “It was a fun evening,” said Nick Waller, who worked on the paper in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s. “It was good to see all my old Cardinal friends and to meet the current students who are now in charge and leading the Cardinal into the next 100 years.”


    Photo: The Louisville Cardinal’s 100th Anniversary Celebration, which took place in Room W116/117 of UofL’s Student Activities Center from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Friday, Oct. 23, 2026.

    Photo By: Nick Waller

    Photo Gallery: To view a photo gallery from the event, click here.

    Commentary: The anniversary celebration brought back a flood of memories for The Cardinal’s alumni. Former staffer Jim Hines talks about why the paper means so much to him and many others in this touching tribute.

  • More Than A Newspaper: Anniversary Celebration Brings Flood Of Memories

    More Than A Newspaper: Anniversary Celebration Brings Flood Of Memories

    Commentary
    By Jim Hines

    Recently, many of us gathered to celebrate the 100th anniversary of The Louisville Cardinal. Seeing old friends opened memory’s door, and the flood ensued.

    There were familiar faces, stories that hadn’t been told in decades and, inevitably, a few recollections that differed depending on who was doing the telling. Time has a way of polishing some memories and conveniently erasing others. But what struck me most was how easily the years fell away. For a little while, we weren’t as old anymore. We were college students again, working together to put out a newspaper.

    And, at least in my case, trying to figure out what we wanted to do with our lives.

    I suspect most of us arrived at college with some vague notion of where we were headed. Some had a plan. Others had a pretty good idea. And then there were those of us who were simply trying to find our place in the world.

    I fell squarely into that last category.

    When I arrived at the University of Louisville in 1984, I had interests, certainly, but no grand career plan. Like a lot of freshmen, I was searching for something without really knowing what that something was.

    And then, somehow, I found my way to The Cardinal.

    Actually, it’s not somehow. I was guided. Pushed. Led.

    William Thompson, who taught some of us newswriting, pushed me. I wish I could tell you there was some defining moment when I knew I’d found my calling. Some “aha” moment. A moment of clarity.

    But there wasn’t. At least not that I remember.

    Instead, it happened gradually, almost without my noticing. Somewhere between the deadlines, the friendships and the chaos of putting out a newspaper, I began to find my way. I just didn’t know it at the time.

    Back then, The Cardinal occupied the entire third floor of the old Student Center. It was a remarkable amount of space for a student newspaper, and to those of us who worked there, it became something of a second home.

    There were desks, typewriters, actual desktop telephones, old IBM computers, stacks of paper, the inevitable clutter and an assortment of personalities who somehow managed to come together to produce a newspaper.

    It wasn’t always pretty. But it was ours.

    We were young, opinionated and occasionally convinced we knew considerably more than we actually did. We argued about stories, headlines, photographs and things that probably seemed terribly important at the time. We made mistakes. We missed things. And every so often, we got something exactly right.

    Looking back, I think one of the most valuable things The Cardinal gave us was the freedom to fail.

    There weren’t many places where a college student could make real decisions, deal with real consequences and then come back the next day to try again. At The Cardinal, that was pretty much the job description.

    And somewhere along the way, without quite realizing it, I began to grow up.

    I learned how to write a bit, certainly. But I also learned how to listen, how to work with people whose opinions differed from mine, how to meet deadlines and how to take responsibility when things went wrong. I learned that having a good idea wasn’t nearly as important as being able to execute it.

    Perhaps most importantly, I began to understand that I could make a living doing something I genuinely enjoyed.

    The Cardinal opened a door at The Courier-Journal, where I honed my skills and discovered opportunities in newspaper operations and technology. Those experiences eventually led to a career that took me to Dow Jones, GateHouse Media, Naviga and BLOX Digital, among others.

    Along the way, I worked with some extraordinary people, participated in projects I never could have imagined as a college student and, most importantly, met the woman who would become my wife.

    It’s a remarkable chain of events when you stop to think about it.

    And it all traces back to that third floor of the Student Center.

    That brings me back to the centennial celebration and the friends who helped open memory’s door.

    As we traded stories, I was reminded that The Cardinal wasn’t simply a place where we learned to produce a newspaper. It was a place where we learned about ourselves. We developed friendships, discovered talents we didn’t know we possessed and began finding our way into the world.

    And now, we have an opportunity to make sure another generation gets that same chance.

    A fundraising campaign is underway to help sustain The Louisville Cardinal and provide today’s student journalists with the opportunities we enjoyed. I hope my fellow Cardinal alumni will consider contributing by going to Give.Louisville.Edu/TheCardinal or using the QR code. It’s a chance to give something back to an institution that gave so much to us, often in ways we didn’t fully appreciate until years later.

    Years ago, a wise professor told me, “You’ll always need to know how to write.”

    He was right.

    Writing has served me throughout my career, helping me explain complicated ideas, communicate difficult decisions and occasionally persuade people to see things a little differently.

    But what I learned at The Cardinal went well beyond putting words on paper.

    I sometimes wonder what would have happened had I never wandered into those offices. Would I have found another path? Probably. Would it have been as rewarding? I have no idea.

    What I do know is that a somewhat lost college student found a place where he belonged and opportunities he never imagined existed.

    And, more than four decades later, I’m still grateful.

    For the friendships. For the lessons. For the opportunities.

    And for that wonderful, chaotic newspaper on the third floor.


    Photo: The Louisville Cardinal’s 100th Anniversary Celebration Oct. 23 included a panel discussion featuring Jim Hines (left), Deborah Yetter and Tate Luckey. Current Cardinal staffers Vinny Porco (Editor-in-Chief) and Roxy Osborne (News Editor) are by the podium.

    Photo By: Ralph Merkel, Cardinal Adviser, 2013-present.

  • Fundraiser launched for The Louisville Cardinal, UofL’s student newspaper

    Fundraiser launched for The Louisville Cardinal, UofL’s student newspaper

    As The Louisville Cardinal celebrates its 100th anniversary, alumni and supporters are launching a monthlong fundraiser to help ensure the University of Louisville’s independent student newspaper has a future as well as a past.

    The campaign, which runs Oct. 1 through Nov. 2, has a goal of raising $4,000 to help support the paper’s operations. Contributions can be made at give.louisville.edu/TheCardinal or using the QR code at lcag.site/qr.

    “Everyone who’s ever worked for The Cardinal was deeply influenced by it, both personally and professionally,” said George Taylor Jr., an alumnus who helped form the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group in February. “We look back fondly on those formative years, and we want student journalists today and in the future to have the same positive experience we did. That’s why we’re holding this fundraiser — to help ensure that future and hopefully make it a little brighter.”

    The campaign comes after a difficult decade for The Cardinal.

    “The Cardinal has survived a lot of turbulence in the past 10 years. We truly thought we would go out of business,” The Cardinal’s adviser Ralph Merkel said in an interview about the upcoming Oct. 23 anniversary event. “But we pivoted to digital only and continue to grow and thrive online. The Cardinal is so important to the University and its students because it tells stories from the student perspective, which can often be lost.”

    The newspaper faced a financial crisis in 2017 when UofL announced it was withdrawing financial support. Alumni and community members rallied around the publication, and The Cardinal ultimately retained enough university support to continue operating. The paper stopped publishing a weekly print edition in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic and has since operated as a digital publication at www.louisvillecardinal.com.

    That will change, at least for one issue, on Oct. 23. The Cardinal will publish a special centennial edition — its first print edition since 2020 — as part of the university’s celebration of the newspaper’s 100th anniversary.

    Donors who contribute at least $25 during the fundraiser will be recognized on the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group’s website. Recognition levels are Platinum for contributions of $100 or more, Gold for $50 and Silver for $25.

    Taylor said supporting The Cardinal also means supporting the next generation of journalists.

    “Anyone who reads the news knows that journalism has never been more necessary and more important than it is right now,” he said. “It’s under attack from some quarters, and that’s why anything we can do to help preserve and sustain it is so important.”

    An update on the fundraising campaign will be announced during UofL’s Oct. 23 centennial celebration. The free event is open to the public and will be held from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in Room W116/117 of UofL’s Student Activities Center. Light refreshments and nonalcoholic beverages will be provided.

    Copies of The Cardinal’s special 100th anniversary print edition will be distributed at the event.

    Following the university celebration, the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group will host a gathering from 9:00 p.m. to midnight at Clifton Tavern, formerly Hilltop Tavern, 1800 Frankfort Ave, 40206.

  • UofL will celebrate student newspaper’s 100th anniversary with free public event

    UofL will celebrate student newspaper’s 100th anniversary with free public event

    By Paul Fultz

    In celebration of The Louisville Cardinal’s 100th anniversary, the University of Louisville will hold a public talk on Friday, Oct. 23 honoring the centennial.

    “To have survived and thrived for 100 years is remarkable,” said Ralph Merkel, adviser for UofL’s independent student news source. “The Cardinal has survived a lot of turbulence in the past 10 years. We truly thought we would go out of business. But we pivoted to digital only and continue to grow and thrive online. The Louisville Cardinal is so important to the University and its students. The Cardinal tells stories from the student perspective, which can often be lost.”

    The event is free and open to the public and will take place in UofL’s Student Activities Center from 7:00 PM – 8:30 PM in Room W116/117. Light refreshments and non-alcoholic beverages will be provided free of charge.

    The financial difficulties Merkel referred to occurred in 2017, when UofL announced it was pulling its financial support for the publication. The community and The Cardinal’s alumni rallied around the paper, which was able to retain enough financial support from UofL to carry on publishing. The Cardinal ceased publishing a weekly print edition in 2020 in the wake of COVID. It is online at http://www.louisvillecardinal.com.

    Cardinal Editor-in-Chief Vinny Porco said the publication continues to provide the University community with outstanding reporting and an invaluable student perspective.

    “What makes The Louisville Cardinal so integral to the UofL community is its niche,” he said. “We know the university mechanisms and are able to give special attention to stories that other local publications might miss. Students can see themselves represented in human-centric features, hot-button opinion pieces, Cardinal sports write-ups and the news stories that matter most to them.”

    Porco will speak at the event, which will also include a panel discussion featuring alumni from throughout the publication’s history.

    A special print edition celebrating The Cardinal’s 100th anniversary will be distributed at the event. Porco said he and his staff are excited about producing the issue.

    “This will mark The Cardinal’s first endeavor back into print in over six years,” he said. “To the staff, it means recreating the pride of holding our journalism in-hand that nearly a century of college journalists got to enjoy. To the community, it means remembering what it was like to have The Cardinal around campus, there for you to pick up instead of having to type in a URL.”

    George Taylor Jr. is one of the founders of The Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group, an organization formed in February to help support The Cardinal and celebrate its history. Taylor, the paper’s Editor-in-Chief in 1993-94, said he’s excited about the gathering and can’t wait to see the print issue.

    “I know all the alumni are grateful that UofL and The Cardinal are putting on such a wonderful event,” he said. “We’re looking forward to it, and the fact that there will be a commemorative print issue is icing on the cake. Print isn’t dead and neither are we, so let’s celebrate!”

    After the event, the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group will host a get together at the Clifton Tavern (formerly Hilltop Tavern), 1800 Frankfort Ave, 40206, from 9:00 PM – Midnight. Porco said he’s grateful for the support The Cardinal has received from alumni and everyone else who’s had a hand in the publication’s success.

    “This centennial is only happening because of people, the same people that made The Louisville Cardinal happen for 100 years,” he said. “The support of our wonderful alumni, faculty adviser, editors and staff means the world.”

  • Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group Expands Outreach With Facebook Page

    Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group Expands Outreach With Facebook Page

    In an effort to expand outreach to its members, the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group has branched out into social media by establishing a Facebook page. Located at www.facebook.com/groups/867023753453520, the page is designed to help alumni stay in touch and share their memories.

    “We have several generations of alumni, and they’re located all over the country,” said alum George Taylor, who was The Cardinal’s Editor-in-Chief in 1993-94. “We hope this page will help bring them together and renew old friendships.”

    The Facebook page is also designed to help alumni keep up with news about the ongoing 100th anniversary celebration of The Louisville Cardinal, the University of Louisville’s independent student news source. Facebook was founded in 2004 and has approximately three billion monthly active users worldwide. It is the third-most-visited website in the world and has one of the world’s most downloaded mobile apps.

    The Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group was started in February after several alumni attended a 100th anniversary event for The Cardinal held at UofL and visited the ongoing anniversary exhibit. The group’s website is at https://lcag.site, and you can sign up for its newsletter by emailing lcag94@aol.com.

    The Facebook page was initially created in 2017 by alum Michael Lindenberger, The Cardinal’s Editor-in-Chief in 1995 (Spring) and 1995-96, in response to a financial crisis that threatened the paper’s continued existence. He helped rally support by asking alumni to contribute money for an advertisement that ran in the paper. The ad, signed by dozens of alumni, stressed The Cardinal’s importance to students and the UofL community and urged the University to restore its funding.

    These efforts, along with multiple articles and opinion pieces that ran in The Courier-Journal and elsewhere, convinced UofL to restore enough funding to allow the paper to continue publishing. The Cardinal ceased publishing a print edition in 2020 in the wake of COVID and is now online only at www.louisvillecardinal.com. Lindenberger passed away in 2022.

    “The Facebook page had been inactive since 2020,” Taylor said. “With 2026 being the publication’s 100th anniversary, it seemed like the perfect time to revive it. UofL is planning another anniversary event in the fall, so stay tuned for news and information about that and other upcoming events.”

  • Do Facebook’s Good Points Outweigh Its Bad Ones?

    Do Facebook’s Good Points Outweigh Its Bad Ones?

    Commentary
    By Paul Fultz

    When a friend and colleague told me a group we’re in now has a Facebook page, I couldn’t help being a little skeptical and more than a little sarcastic.

    “We have a Facebook page?” I asked. “Is that a good thing?”

    As it turns out, it is. But it’s not difficult to understand my skepticism: as popular and seemingly omnipresent as Facebook is, it has more than its share of detractors.

    My friend George Taylor and I are part of the Louisville Cardinal Alumni Group, an organization of former University of Louisville students who worked for UofL’s independent student newspaper, The Louisville Cardinal.

    The group’s members have varying opinions about Facebook. Some are avid users, some maintain accounts but don’t use them very often, and some have either never used the platform or are former users who’ve abandoned it completely.

    That’s the reason the group’s primary means of communicating with members is email and our website at https://lcag.site. Unlike a Facebook page, the website doesn’t require you to sign up or provide any personal information, and there’s no chance you’ll run into your 10th grade girlfriend or boyfriend while scrolling through its pages.

    And Facebook can be hazardous to your mental health. One alum recently got back on for the first time in years, using it to reconnect with old friends and exchange phone numbers and email addresses. Two weeks later he deactivated his account again, saying “I was spending too much time scrolling through my feed, and every time I did it was annoying and drove me nuts.”

    Anyone who’s ever used Facebook can relate to that statement, at least a little. I certainly can. In many ways I enjoy it, but I’m well aware of the down side and have spent a great deal of time complaining about it. Why do I dislike Facebook? Let me count the reasons:

    * Everything I’ve ever read about Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg indicates he’s a terrible person who would sell the entire human race out if he thought it might earn him an extra dollar. Which makes him no different than most billionaires, but that’s no excuse. Zuckerberg and his fellow tech bros have also spent a lot of time contributing money to and sucking up to America’s least favorite fascist dictator, Donald Trump. That alone is enough to make me want to shun Zuckerberg and everything he touches.

    * And then there’s Artificial Intelligence (AI), which Facebook not only supports, but is determined to shove down everyone’s throats whether we like it or not. Every time I’m on Facebook I’m deluged with ads for AI products. Every time I see one I click on the X to make it go away, and a few minutes later it’s replaced by a new one. Anytime someone tries that hard to make you do something it’s always for their benefit, not yours.

    The arguments against AI are well-documented, but I’ll summarize them briefly: it’s terrible for the environment, it takes away people’s jobs at a time when many are already struggling, and it’s supported by the same billionaires who are determined to end democracy.

    I understand that many people who use AI have little to no choice in the matter. Many are required to do so by their jobs or their schools, and there’s not a lot they can do about it short of making the unwise decision to become unemployed and/or a dropout. I’ve also heard the argument that “AI is in phones, its in social media, if you use those you support AI!”

    First of all, there wasn’t any AI in cell phones and social media when I started using them, and just because someone came along and put it there later doesn’t mean I’m going to stop using them. I’d prefer to just complain relentlessly until it’s taken back out.

    * There’s a lot of fake news on Facebook, and much of it seems to favor right wingers. Which is no surprise given Zuckerberg’s political leanings. And many of us have experienced instances where we post something criticizing the right, only to have Facebook delete it and/or penalize us for posting it. Facebook’s rules about what one can and cannot post are wildly inconsistent and selectively enforced, to say the least.

    * Even the non-political ads on Facebook are annoying and violate people’s privacy. We’ve all experienced a situation where we click on an ad we’ve never clicked on before and never click on again, but ads for that product then follow us around for weeks or even years. Facebook sells advertisers our personal data, allowing them to track us within inches of our lives to try to sell us crap we don’t need.

    But if Facebook is so terrible, why would I ever use it? Why would anyone? On some days I’m still not sure, but I do remember why I started using it 17 years ago (gasp!) in 2009.

    Once again all credit goes to my friend George, although any blame is entirely my own. George texted me and said something like “So you’ve heard of Facebook, right? I got on a few weeks ago and I’m really enjoying it. It’s a great way to reconnect with old friends, and then you can leave sarcastic comments on their page! I feel like it’s right up your alley.”

    I responded by texting “Thanks for thinking of me, but I would, never, ever, get on Facebook. It’s a total violation of privacy. I’m going to volunteer my personal info so advertisers and everyone who’s ever known me can track my every move? No thank you. Not in this lifetime!”

    A few hours later, I got the following text from a woman I’d dated a few years earlier: “How’s it going? I was scrolling through the contacts in my phone, saw your name and thought I’d see what you’ve been up to. Are you on Facebook? I just got on a few weeks ago and it’s really fun.”

    Ten minutes later I had created a Facebook account, sent out dozens of friend requests, and texted her back: “My friend George was just telling me about Facebook. I just created an account!” Then I texted George: “It seems I owe you a big apology. It’s kind of a funny story . . .”

    And sure enough, once I was on Facebook I found myself enjoying it. While I ran into more than a few people I’d just as soon have forgotten, I also reconnected with a lot of old friends I remain in touch with to this day. And George was right, I loved leaving sarcastic comments on people’s pages. And most of them didn’t even unfriend me!

    It wasn’t all sarcastic comments, though. I also liked engaging in serious political discussions with my Facebook friends, most of whom are highly intelligent and have lots of insightful points. And I used to love arguing with idiots in the comments section who said things like “I’ve done my own research, and scientists are wrong about this” and “I bet you wouldn’t say that to my face. Unless I was working on my Camaro, because everyone knows I wouldn’t stop working on my Camaro just to kick your ass.”

    It took me years to stop arguing with idiots in the comments section. I had long since stopped enjoying it, but I somehow felt compelled to continue trying to make my point. After all, I had logic and reason on my side. And sarcasm! But I finally realized that he who continually argues with idiots risks becoming an idiot. I still have occasional lapses, but for the most part now when someone says a deadly disease is best treated by drinking bleach, I stay quiet and just leave them to it.

    One thing I like about Facebook is it allows you to share news and opinions with others, then receive instant feedback. As a former journalist who long ago left the field (first for pr/marketing, then IT), it scratches my occasional itch to publish something and have someone read it. And what Facebook user hasn’t posted something and then watched with glee as it quickly received dozens or even hundreds of likes? And who hasn’t posted something they thought was pretty clever, then watched with dismay as it got only three likes in 24 hours? Not me, I can tell you that.

    Another great feature is you can join or even create pages to suit your interests, such as the alumni group page I mentioned. You just have to be aware that Facebook can censor or shut your page down at any time for any reason, and those reasons often make no sense.

    I’ve been a member or administrator of several humor pages that were shut down for a series of jokes that were so mild they could have aired on what’s left of network TV. That’s why you have to be sure to make a list of group members and their contact info, so you can recreate the page under a different name if and when Facebook nukes it. Such is life in the digital theocracy that is social media.

    Despite its disadvantages, for me the good parts of Facebook still outweigh the bad. As much as I’m tempted to stop doing business with any giant corporation whose actions and motives could be described as less than pure (all of them, basically), I realize that in order to do that I’d have to leave society and go live in a cave. And when I tried that the WiFi was terrible, so that’s not going to happen again.

    So overall, I’m feeling pretty good about being on Facebook. If nothing else, it’s free and I’m bored. And the alumni page is working out great. Plus I’ve mastered a form of social media that is shunned by both the very young and the very old, which positively delights me. I’m happy to be socializing with other middle aged people, especially since I can do so while still sitting on my couch.

    But just as I was basking in the glow of being a modern person who made the very progressive decision to continue using social media instead of going underground, I got a call from George, who said “So you’ve heard of Instagram, right?”

    They tell me my scream could be heard half a block away. But once I explained to my neighbors why, they said they completely understood and all was forgiven.

  • World Cup Marathon Tests Limits of Columnist’s Endurance

    World Cup Marathon Tests Limits of Columnist’s Endurance

    Commentary
    By Nick Waller

    Being newly early retired and with unlimited goof-off time, I decided to challenge myself to watch all 104 matches of the 2026 World Cup. It took a lot of Monster Energy drinks and coffee to sit through each and every match. My Thornton’s Rewards Card runneth over.

    When there were two matches on at a time, I watched the second game on a computer while “the big game” was on the TV. And now that it’s over and I survived, it all seems like a blur.

    The World Cup is the most viewed, most analyzed, most over-analyzed, most beautiful and most frustrating sporting event on this and perhaps any planet (change my mind.) It has been a must watch event for me since I made fun of a coworker going to the 1998 World Cup in France.

    “Soccer is slow. It’s boring,” I said to my buddy Tad. “Just watch one match,” he replied. I did. Just one. Then another. Then as many as I could. Every four years ever since. The great games hooked me in. But watching the fans, seeing how much it meant to them, brought me back for years.

    The World Cup is a quadriennal tournament which has been around since Uruguay beat Argentina 4-2 in 1930. This year 48 teams from powers like France and Spain, to teams I had never heard of like Cabo Verde, battled in the planet’s biggest sporting event.

    It’s hard to sum up such a prolonged and intense viewing experience. But as Rick Bozich might say, here are a few thoughts written on the back of my game-used Lamine Yamal jersey.

    MEDIA: I am old. I am grumpy. I will be dead soon. I am hypercritical of the media having worked in it since Betamax tapes. I watched the Fox coverage of the World Cup until the United States second match against Australia. It was a group stage match. The US plays three games in group stage, guaranteed. If you play well enough you go to the knockout round. If you lose there you’re out.

    So think of the group stage as the World Cup regular season and the knockout round as lose and go home like the NCAA Tournament. In 2026 the US qualified for the knockout round for the eighth time. Keep in mind any of those matches are higher up the food chain then playing Australia in the group stage.

    So when Fox announcer John Strong, in a bit of an overreach, hinted pre-match this was the biggest match in team history, I could bear their coverage no longer. I decided it was Telemundo time.

    I watched over 80 matches on Telemundo. They spoke at the right times, shut up at the right times and got excited about gameplay at the right times. And I am pretty sure they didn’t say “Brad Pitt among the fans here,” as Fox did during a camera shot of Matt Damon. But I don’t know if Telemundo made the same mistake. Even after many hours of coverage, the only Spanish word I know is Gooooooool!

    CABO VERDE: The smallest team population-wise and second smallest ever, Cabo Verde punched above their weight class every match, making the knockout stage in their first appearance. Vozinha, the team’s 40-year-old goalkeeper, had about fifty thousand Instagram follows before the team’s David and Goliath Group Stage matchup with one of the pre-tournament favorites,, Spain.

    A Spanish goal seemed a foregone conclusion, but it never happened. Cabo nil, 2026 World Cup champs nil. Vozinha, who went from an unknown to worldwide stardom, now has over 29 million Instagram followers.

    SCOTLAND: As one of my favorite teams in the World Cup, Scotland’s flameout in the Group Stage hurt. But any team whose fan base caused bars to run out of beer in every city they visited demand our attention and respect. Well done Tartan Army!

    THE THIRD-PLACE GAME: England versus France. Two of the top four teams in the tournament played in the third-place match. Almost nobody cared. Two teams who were one win away and couldn’t get over the line, now playing in a consolation match, all hope for the big trophy gone. But the goals came early and often in England’s 6-4 win. In basketball terms it was like watching Loyola Marymount put up 160 every night in the late 1980s and early 90s.

    THE FINAL: Spain one, Argentina nil. In what was likely his last World Cup match, 39-year-old Lionel Messi finally looked old. After scoring an impressive 19 goals in the World Cup, the Argentinian team managed no shots and no shots on goal in 90 regulation minutes in the final. They finished with two extra time shot attempts, neither on target.

    Translation: Spain’s goalkeeper did no work that day. The game was marred by a post match fight, fueled by Argentina’s Leandro Paredes who earned a red card for his efforts.

    The next World Cup will be hosted by Spain, Portugal and Morocco. I should be caught up on my sleep by then, and I have plenty of time to learn some Spanish. Downloading the Duolingo app now. See you in 2030!

    Illustration by George Taylor Jr.

  • The (Not So Secret) Origin Of The Louisville Cardinal

    The (Not So Secret) Origin Of The Louisville Cardinal

    Commentary
    By Paul Fultz

    When I first heard that 2026 is the 100th anniversary of The Louisville Cardinal, I thought my memory was playing tricks on me.

    “The Cardinal is 100 years old? Impossible!” I wrote in a social media post, only half-jokingly. “It was only 61 when I started there in 1987 when I was 18, and that was what, 20 years ago? Um, on second thought, never mind.”

    What can I say, math was never my strongest subject. But I did remember an anniversary issue early on in my freshman year, when I was just getting started as a fledgling sports writer on the University of Louisville’s independent student newspaper. Was it the 50th anniversary issue? And if so, how to explain the time discrepancy?

    For just a moment, I let my imagination run wild. As a lifelong fan of science fiction, comic books and old episodes of the Twilight Zone, I began to imagine different scenarios.

    Was there a time warp, perhaps caused by an ex-staffer going back in time to finally meet a missed deadline and not get yelled at by a particularly terrifying editor? Did he cause a radioactive journalist to bite someone, resulting in an outbreak of truth-telling among the student population? Dare I discover The Secret Origin of The Louisville Cardinal?

    Then I took a deep breath and remembered that most if not all of the answers I sought were in the UofL Archives, which has nearly every issue in the paper’s long history in both print and digital form. A little research revealed that while The Cardinal’s origin and history is a bit convoluted, it’s hardly a secret. It’s well-documented and has been at least partially told on several occasions.

    But even though it’s not a secret, the origin and history of The Louisville Cardinal is a rip-roaring tale filled with enough twists and turns, student rebellions, angry administrators, and even occasional bouts of nudity and foul language, to fuel a modern day Hollywood blockbuster. Truth, as they say, is stranger and fiction. Or as I like to say, you can’t make this stuff up.



    The anniversary edition I remembered was published on September 17, 1987 and was the 55th anniversary issue. But wouldn’t that make The Cardinal ninety-four years old now? As it turns out, it depends on how you count.

    The first issue of The Cardinal was published on Sept. 16, 1932. It was called The Cardinal then, and the name would not be changed to The Louisville Cardinal until Sept. 23, 1966. But The Cardinal was preceded by The Cardinal News, which was published in 1926-27 from September 24, 1926 until June 3, 1927 when it was discontinued.

    The U. of L. News followed The Cardinal News, with its first issue debuting on Feb. 24, 1928. It was published in 1928-29 and 1929-30 before being discontinued by its editors, who cited a lack of support. Two years passed with no student newspaper until The Cardinal debuted in the fall of 1932-33, and it has been published continuously ever since.

    So yes, for all intents and purposes The Louisville Cardinal is turning 100 in 2026. The first issue of The Cardinal News was UofL’s first independent student newspaper, and the wellspring from which subsequent student news publications sprang.

    Besides, it’s too late to change all the signage. And in six years we may too busy to write this history while fighting off AI with one hand and Mad Max-style pirates trying to steal our water supply with the other.



    The creation of a weekly independent student newspaper at UofL began to take shape in 1922. That’s when UofL student Samuel E. Hymen led a group of UofL students in the formation of a Journalism Club. Their primary intent was to generate interest in creating a journalism chair at the University, but their discussions ultimately lead to the creation of The Cardinal News in 1926. It produced 31 weekly issues until it was discontinued on June 3, I927.

    Right from the start, UofL’s student newspaper found itself at the center of controversy when they covered UofL President George Colvin’s series of disagreements with faculty members who accused him of antisemitism, favoritism, and anti-intellectualism.

    Colvin’s policies lead to the resignation of Louis D. Gottschalk, a UofL history professor who later received recognition at the University of Chicago as a historian of the French Revolution. Editorially, The Cardinal News criticized the President and his supporters.

    They also covered other events that would have a major impact on UofL, including construction bids for the Administration Building, the growing interest of United States Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis in the University’s School of Law, and the initiation of a UofL endowment campaign.

    A year and a half after The Cardinal News ceased publication, a new student newspaper called The U. of L. News debuted on Feb. 24, 1928. But unlike its predecessor, it was not independent: the new Faculty Committee on Student Publications had the final say regarding its contents.

    The U. of L. News steered clear of the Colvin controversy, but when the President died it criticized “those few hoodlum fools on the faculty” who reportedly “gathered for a celebration upon hearing of the death.” But by the spring of 1930 it had met the same fate as The Cardinal News – discontinued due to lack of support.

    Two years later The Cardinal was established and operated under a Board of Student Publications created by President Raymond A. Kent, which included three faculty members as well as students.

    The early Cardinal was a vigorous student weekly with editorial opinions on local, national, and international issues. In 1936, editor Lewis M. Cohen wrote that during his term he had “tried to arouse a lasting social consciousness.”

    The newspaper was strongly critical of an American Legion investigation of radicalism on campus, and promoted isolationism even after Germany invaded Poland on Sept 1, 1939. In 1940, The Cardinal announced a change in editorial focus from national and international topics to university issues.


    In 1933, the paper started one of its most enduring traditions: offending readers by telling jokes many considered inappropriate.

    The annual Cardinal joke edition became a regular item during the 1930s. On February 10, 1933, the editors announced the upcoming comic issue and encouraged readers not to take offense.

    The special issue appeared the next week, printed in red ink. It contained descriptions of a university as they might have been written by various American authors, including Sinclair Lewis. The paper reported that Lewis would write the sentence “Elmer Gantry surveyed the ugly red brick buildings which raised their drab shapes into a gray, winter sky.”

    The tone of The Cardinal changed gradually during the late ‘50s and early 1960s. In October 1960. some local residents complained to U of L President Philip G. Davidson that a recent Cardinal article had shown a “sick, beatnik sense of humor.”

    One observer was even moved to say that “the printing of restroom wall inscriptions in the campus paper causes me to wonder if perhaps freedom of the press is a mistake.”

    The late ‘60s and early 1970s, a period coinciding with general student rebellion in the United States, brought changes in The Cardinal which shocked many old-line liberals.

    The 1969 April Fool edition of the newspaper caused President Woodrow M. Strickler to suspend publication briefly following the use of what The Courier-Journal called “a couple of poverty-stricken four-letter words.”

    Although the suspension was brief, some believed Strickler had acted too harshly, while others accused the President of showing weakness. A Louisville Times editorial said the University had exercised “grace and good sense” in the matter.

    During the ‘70s, the April Fool issue of the paper continued to be controversial, as in 1977 when the joke edition announced the death of President James Greer Miller.


    The April Fools situation came to a head on April 13, 1979, when The Cardinal, under the direction of editor Tom Murray, released a fictitious issue bearing a three-column photograph of several hundred nude people on its front page. The accompanying cutline read:

    “Still hope: World leaders yesterday grappled with last minute negotiations for the nuclear peace in front of U.N. headquarters in New York. Negotiators spumed offers of clothing explaining that clothes would only irritate their charred flesh.”

    Inside stories included a report of U of L’s entire football team being arrested on drug, sodomy, and subversion charges. Only one ad in the issue had not been altered, which resulted in the total collapse of the paper’s advertising credentials.

    The editorial page was topped with one-and-a-half inch high type spelling out a message described by Michael Wines of The Louisville Times as “a mere two words, one of which describes a sexual act in terms not generally used in tearoom conversation.”

    The issue drew immediate and infuriated response from many members of the University community, particularly football coach Vince Gibson, who remarked “this ain’t no April Fool. Read the calendar. This is April 13.”

    The Student Board of Communications passed a resolution disapproving of the issue and called for a retraction from Murray in the final edition of the year. Murray refused, and along with his managing editor Don Floyd, was promptly removed from his post and replaced by editor-appointee Mark Grundy by Vice President for Student Affairs Edward H. Hammond.

    Grundy produced the final issue, complete with retraction. As a result of the controversy, the Board of Student Publications examined means of relieving the University of legal responsibility for The Cardinal.

    After the incident, Murray said his main goal in publishing the inflammatory edition was to move the paper closer to complete independence, admitting that he was “constantly bucking authority.”

    Murray became so concerned with The Cardinal’s lack of control over the material that went on its pages that he said the rest of the University community viewed his virtually helpless staff as a “bunch of heroin addicts and groupies.”

    By the spring of 1979 Murray’s vision of an independent Cardinal had come to pass. The University relinquished all editorial control and legal responsibility for the paper. A yearly grant from the independent University Foundation replaced direct University funding, and The Louisville Cardinal was incorporated as a separate business entity.

    Grundy and his successors faced the considerable challenge of re-establishing The Cardinal’s credibility, which had disintegrated during the April Fools episode. But it was slowly rebuilt over time, and by the early 1980s the paper was back to full strength.


    In 1981 Donald C. Swain became UofL’s President, a position he held until 1995. Under his leadership, UofL was slowly but surely transformed from a sleepy commuter school into a larger, more modern university with a greater emphasis on research and the external funding it provides.

    The campus, student body, and faculty all expanded during Swain’s tenure, but not without a lot of growing pains. Disputes between Swain and the faculty were common, and The Cardinal faithfully covered each and every one of them, often providing a depth of coverage and a perspective that other local and national publications could not.

    The athletics program also expanded rapidly during the 1980s and 1990s. While the men’s basketball team had long been a powerhouse under coach Denny Crum and won national titles in 1980 and 1986, the hiring of coach Howard Schnellenberger in 1985 thrust the football program into the national spotlight. He never got a national championship, but helped build a stadium and won a New Year’s Day Bowl game at the Fiesta Bowl in 1991.

    The Cardinal documented the athletics program’s accession and also the steady stream of alleged NCAA violations (some eventually proven), investigations, suspensions, punishments, appeals, etc. Those were the days: some college athletes drove really nice cars, and student journalists on The Cardinal tried to memorize or discretely write down their license plate numbers and figure out who had purchased them.

    After Swain retired, John W. Shumaker served as UofL President from 1995-2002. Under his leadership UofL’s endowment grew from $183 million to $500 million, its profile as a research university was enhanced greatly, and renowned coach Rick Pitino was hired to coach the school’s basketball team after Crum was pressured into retiring by athletics director Tom Jurich.

    And The Cardinal was there to cover it all, just as they were there to cover the staggering revelations of Shumaker’s bad behavior that came to light after he left UofL to became President of the University of Tennessee.

    Shumaker’s tenure at Tennessee ended in 2003 when he resigned in the midst of controversy over allegations he had misused university funds and resources. After local media reported that Shumaker had used a university-owned airplane for his personal travel, Tennessee did an internal audit and uncovered several other alleged financial improprieties.

    But the worst part was that Shumaker had used the university airplane to visit Carol Garrison, President of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, with whom he had begun a personal relationship while she was provost at the University of Louisville and the then-married Shumaker was President there.

    The Cardinal reported on the scandal and its aftermath: UofL conducted its own internal audit, resulting in allegations that Shumaker had also misused UofL funds while he was President. His career was in shambles, but no criminal charges were ever filed against him. In 2009, UofL named a building after him. I’m still trying to figure that one out.


    And still The Cardinal soldiered on, into the new millennium. In 2000-01 the paper announced a switch from the standard, broadsheet-sized publication to a smaller, tabloid-sized format. And although the use of color on the front page had become increasingly common in the ‘90s, 2000-01 ushered in an era of more color on the front page and elsewhere in order to increase the paper’s visual appeal.

    In early 2001 The Cardinal went online for the first time, where it still maintains a robust presence at www.louisvillecardinal.com

    From 2015 to 2017, The Cardinal played a vital role in covering one of the most turbulent and scandal-plagued periods in UofL’s history. President James Ramsey was accused of embezzlement and ultimately resigned under pressure.

    Coach Rick Pitino and athletics director Tom Jurich were both fired after revelations that escorts were being paid to have sex with basketball players and potential recruits. The Cardinal’s work and the efforts of the many other media outlets who covered the stories were instrumental in helping UofL clean house and move out of this troubled period.

    In 2017, The Cardinal once again experienced financial troubles, troubles so severe that The Courier-Journal ran a story headlined “The University of Louisville pulls funding from student newspaper. Could this mean the end?”

    Because of budgetary shortfalls that were at least partially the result of ex-President Ramsey’s financial mismanagement, UofL announced it was pulling its financial support for the student newspaper.

    The Cardinal’s budget was approximately $146,000 a year, and in prior years the University had helped support the paper by purchasing $60,000 of advertising annually. In 2016 UofL reduced that amount to $40,000, and in 2017 they announced that by 2018 it would be reduced to zero.

    The community and The Cardinal’s alumni rallied around the paper, in the form of opinion pieces in the CJ and elsewhere, and through a Facebook page created to provide financial and moral support.

    Those efforts were successful and The Cardinal was able to retain enough financial support from UofL to carry on publishing, continuing to provide the University community with outstanding reporting and an invaluable student perspective.

    A combination of the paper’s ongoing financial struggles and the sudden onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020 resulted in a decision to make The Cardinal online only going forward. And given the fact that more and more news in the modern era is increasingly online only, the decision to stop publishing a print edition was likely both wise and inevitable.

    Despite plenty of fits and starts along the way, The Louisville Cardinal has survived and prospered for a century and is well-poised to continue doing so for many years. The publication gives a voice to students, helps create a sense of community on campus, and is a tremendous training ground for young journalists.

    So here’s to The Cardinal, and to the hope that another generation of journalists will one day delve into the archives and write the publication’s history for its bicentennial edition. Unless someone decides to do another April Fools issue between now and then. If that happens, all bets are off.

    Photo: The front page of the April Fools Day issue of The Louisville Cardinal, published on April 13, 1979. Why yes, those are naked people. Click here to see the entire front page.

    Sources: The sources for the information in this commentary are the history of The Louisville Cardinal published in its Sept. 17, 1987 issue, various news articles, and the writer’s own research into back issues found in the UofL Archives.

    The history published in The Cardinal in 1987 was particularly helpful, and large parts of it are excerpted here. Some of it has been lightly rewritten for condensation and clarity, and other parts have been reproduced verbatim, including most of the portion concerning the April Fools issues and the April 13, 1979 April Fools edition and its aftermath.

    My thanks go out to the writers and editors of that history: Mark Clark, Kenneth Hardin, and Gregory Harris. Thanks also to Mariann Kurtz and Janice Theriot, who conceived and designed the anniversary issue and were instrumental in its creation.

    Additional credits from the 1987 anniversary issue:
    * Thanks go to the staff of the University Archives and Photo Archives for their encouragement and patient cooperation.
    * Adapted from “The Cardinal: A Record of Student Life” (1980) by Dwayne Cox, associate university archivist, and “Will the Real April Fool Please Stand Up” (1981) by Dawn Yankeelov, Cardinal managing editor in 1980-81 and editor in 1981-82.


    To read the original article from the 1987 anniversary issue, go to
    “The History Of The Louisville Cardinal: The First Six Decades”

    To view the original article and a selection of key issues, go to
    “Photo Gallery: The Louisville Cardinal Throughout The Years”